5 Declassified Truths That Reveal How the Iraq War Was Engineered

Introduction: The War You Think You Know

The story of the Iraq War, as it's commonly told, is a direct and tragic consequence of the September 11th attacks. It was a necessary response to a clear and present danger: a rogue dictator, Saddam Hussein, was believed to possess weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and to be in league with the terrorists who struck America. This narrative, of a nation acting in self-defense on the basis of faulty intelligence, has become the consensus history.

But declassified documents, British government memos, and forensic analysis of the historical record tell a different, more chilling story. They reveal that the war was not a reactive decision made in the fog of a post-9/11 world, but the culmination of a decade-long project. This was an "Architecture of Deception," meticulously designed by a small cadre of ideologues who viewed the invasion not as a last resort, but as a strategic necessity—the fulfillment of a pre-written plan.

This article delves into the five most impactful truths unearthed from this record, revealing how a war of choice was engineered, marketed, and executed long before the public knew it was even a possibility.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. The Blueprint for War Was Drafted in 1997

The paper trail begins not in 2001, but in 1997, with the founding of a neoconservative think tank that would serve as the drafting room for a new imperial architecture: the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). Established by William Kristol and Robert Kagan, PNAC's core mission was to establish and maintain American "Global Primacy" in a post-Cold War world.

Its 1997 "Statement of Principles" was a manifesto for a new, aggressive foreign policy. It was signed by a veritable who's who of the future George W. Bush administration, including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz. These men were united by the conviction that America's "unipolar moment" must be extended indefinitely, through the proactive and unilateral application of military force.

By 1998, PNAC was no longer just theorizing; it was actively agitating for "regime change" in Iraq. In a formal letter to President Bill Clinton, the group demanded the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime, arguing that diplomacy and containment had failed. They explicitly rejected the authority of the United Nations, signaling their intent to bypass international law to achieve their objectives.

"We believe the U.S. has the authority under existing UN resolutions to take the necessary steps, including military steps, to protect our vital interests in the Gulf. In any case, American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on Unanimity in the UN Security Council."

This detail is profoundly significant. It proves the intellectual case for war was established and its architects were in place long before the intelligence case was even attempted. The war was the goal, not the outcome.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. The Architects Were Waiting for a "New Pearl Harbor"

But a blueprint, no matter how detailed, remains purely academic without a political mandate. The architects at PNAC were keenly aware that their vision for global primacy was too radical for a nation at peace; they needed a crisis, and they put it in writing.

In their 2000 report, Rebuilding America's Defenses (RAD), PNAC detailed the specific military transformations required to achieve global hegemony. Buried within this document is a chillingly prescient sentence that reveals their understanding that a national crisis was a prerequisite for enacting their plan.

"...the process of transformation... is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor."

When the attacks of September 11, 2001, occurred, the architects did not just see a tragedy; they saw their opportunity. Declassified handwritten notes from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld on that very afternoon show an immediate pivot toward Iraq, a target with no connection to the attacks. His directive was not just to find the perpetrators, but to leverage the crisis for a much broader agenda.

"Best info fast. Judge whether good enough hit S.H. [Saddam Hussein] at same time. Not only UBL [Usama bin Laden]. Go massive. Sweep it all up. Things related and not."

The analysis is stark: to the war's architects, the 9/11 attacks were the "New Pearl Harbor" they knew they needed. It was the key that unlocked the vault of American power, allowing them to move their pre-existing plan from paper to the battlefield.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. The "Intelligence Failure" Was Actually an Intelligence-Fixing Operation

With the political will secured by a national trauma, the architects next required a mechanism to create a legal justification for their pre-existing target: Iraq. The Iraq War is often described as an "intelligence failure," but the declassified record suggests something far more deliberate: an intelligence-fixing operation where the conclusion (war) was decided in advance, and intelligence was actively manufactured to justify it. This institutional capture was the necessary mechanical step to retroactively justify the blueprint drafted by PNAC years earlier.

The primary engine of this operation was the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans (OSP). Staffed by ideological loyalists, its mission was to bypass the CIA and "find the evidence" that the professional intelligence community could not. The OSP's primary methodology was "Stovepiping," a process where raw, unvetted intelligence—often from fraudulent defectors like "Curveball"—was sent directly to the White House, bypassing the CIA's rigorous verification process.

This manipulation was driven by a radical new standard for preemption articulated by Vice President Dick Cheney, known as the "One Percent Doctrine." This doctrine effectively abolished the need for evidence, replacing it with suspicion.

"If there's a 1% chance that Pakistani scientists are helping al-Qaeda build or develop a nuclear weapon, we have to treat it as a certainty in terms of our response. It's not about our analysis, or finding a preponderance of evidence."

The most damning assessment of this process came from a secret British government document, the "Downing Street Memo." The memo, which summarized a high-level meeting in July 2002, laid bare the mood in Washington and confirmed that the war was a foregone conclusion. It cements the argument that intelligence was not discovered, but manufactured.

"Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. A Secret Society Network Fueled a "Conflict of Allegiance"

Manufacturing intelligence on this scale required an extraordinary level of internal discipline and a near-total absence of dissent. To understand how such a consensus was enforced, one must look beyond policy and into the sociological DNA of the architects themselves. A disproportionate number of key players, including President George W. Bush and his father, former CIA director George H.W. Bush, were members of Yale University's secret society, Order 322, more commonly known as Skull and Bones.

This was not a peripheral detail; it was a central organizing principle. The society's philosophy, referencing the year 322 BC, marks the fall of Athenian democracy and the rise of a plutocracy where only the wealthy elite could retain citizenship. This ideology manifested in a network that historically controlled the U.S. national security apparatus through members like Henry Stimson (Secretary of War), Robert A. Lovett (Secretary of Defense), and William F. Buckley Jr. (CIA Officer). The lifelong, secret oath sworn to "the Order" creates a profound "Conflict of Allegiance" that can supersede a member's public oath to the Constitution, neutralizing dissent within an "inner sanctum."

This network's influence culminated in the very blueprint for the war. The critical, synthesizing fact is that the co-founder of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), Robert Kagan (Class of 1980), was himself a Bonesman. The PNAC plan and the secret society were not separate phenomena; they were intrinsically linked.

The network's power is rooted in a financial history as disturbing as its secrecy. The society's corporate entity, the Russell Trust Association, was founded on wealth derived in part from the 19th-century opium trade. More recently, declassified documents from the National Archives confirm that Union Banking Corporation, where Prescott Bush (George H.W. Bush's father) was a director, managed assets for Nazi financier Fritz Thyssen until it was seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act. This history reveals that the Iraq War wasn't just a policy decision but the project of a cohesive, multi-generational elite network operating with a set of allegiances and objectives hidden from public view.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. On 9/10, the Pentagon Admitted $2.3 Trillion Was Missing. On 9/11, the Auditors Were Killed.

While this elite network provided the ideological cohesion for war, the events of 9/11 provided a different, more brutally practical opportunity: the erasure of inconvenient financial truths. On September 10, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference where he admitted the Pentagon's accounting was in such disarray that the department could not track $2.3 trillion in transactions. He declared war on the Pentagon's own bureaucracy.

The next day, that "war" came to the Pentagon. The projectile that struck the building hit the one section that had been recently renovated for blast resistance: the Resource Services Washington (RSW) office. The attack killed the very accountants, auditors, and civilian researchers who were actively investigating the missing trillions. Their records were incinerated.

This pattern of evidence destruction extends to New York. World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC7), a 47-story skyscraper, collapsed at 5:20 PM on 9/11, despite not being hit by an airplane. WTC7 housed critical archives for the SEC and the Secret Service, including documents related to thousands of active investigations into major corporate and financial fraud.

The staggering implication is that the 9/11 attacks, in addition to being a national tragedy and the "New Pearl Harbor" the architects needed, also functioned as a brutally effective digital and physical shredder, wiping clean the slate of inconvenient financial investigations and ensuring the $2.3 trillion question would never be answered.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conclusion: An Architecture Built on Lies

The war in Iraq was not a failure of intelligence; it was a triumph of design. The declassified record reveals a deliberate "Architecture of Deception" built over years by a disciplined and unaccountable network to engineer consent for a pre-planned war. The record shows that the conflict was not a response to a single event, but the product of an elite, multi-generational network that demonstrated it could successfully capture the state, manufacture a reality, and lead a republic into a war of its own design, leaving the truth to be declassified only after the damage was irreversible.

*****
**Marie Seshat Landry**
* CEO / OSINT Spymaster
* Marie Landry Spy Shop
* Email: ceo@marielandryspyshop.com
* Web: marielandryspyshop.com